Skip to main content

Is canvas + ChatGPT a problem or an opportunity: Reports

OpenAI has just announced canvas (https://openai.com/index/introducing-canvas/ ) with ChatGPT as a beta in ChatGPT Plus. Canvas is an extra interface along with the standard text interface for ChatGPT prompts and responses. It feels more like using a featured text editor. 

At the moment OpenAI are rolling out canvas to ChatGPT Plus and Team users, then  Enterprise and Edu users will get access next week; with the plan to make canvas available to all ChatGPT Free users after the beta stage.


So to have a bit of a play I put an old document through it (selected the ChatGPT 4o with canvas option from the ChatGPT Plus drop-down menu), askeing it to use that document as a starting point for a report.


One of the difference is both windows are editable for prompts. So using the lefthand side you can put in a prompt as normal  in ChatGPT but in the right-hand wind you highlight the text and ask ChatGPT do action that bit . 

You can still ask prompts, as in normal ChatGPT, such as "Add appropriate citations through out the report and then add a reference list at the end of the report" as before.

In OpenAIs announcement  (https://openai.com/index/introducing-canvas/ )  they did also suggest a few short cuts that are useful for writing (the ones below are taken directly from the announcement).

Personal view: I do think this is a step to making Generative AI a more user-friendly tool for writing from notes. I do have a concern that this may increase the risk of plagiarism. At the same time the plagarsim concern is balanced out with the hope that tools like canvas are perhaps where Generative AI should be going as a collaborative tool to improve work (not a new insight). It is a more intuitive interface so I believe a step in the right direction.






All opinions in this blog are the Author's and should not in any way be seen as reflecting the views of any organisation the Author has any association with. Twitter @scottturneruon

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GenAI Productivity: Ideas to project proposal 1

One of the ways I use Generative AI with students is to take basic ideas for projects, usually a title, and get these tools to greater ideas and start of a project proposal. This is with all the usual caveats  Check the references (if any); It is going to be basic, so extend it. In this example I am going to use Co-pilot but the ChatGPT, etc can be used, employing a few basic prompt engineering basics: personas (who is the target audience?) and Templates (how do I want it to look?) to start this process. Example:  Project ideas for MSc Data Intelligence students (persona)  on a particular topic. The reply will include subheadings and relevant (hopefully) content for  TITLE, INTRODUCTION, PROBLEM STATEMENT. The prompt: " Taking the topic "Leveraging open-source tools to measure and present academics publications automatically from public domain data.". Give five innovative projects for a Master's level student dissertation in Data Intelligence. Each project example wi...

GenAI Productivity: Ideas to project proposal ideas from Google Scholar

Generated as well by Google Gemini In previous blog posts, I have looked at generating project ideas for project ideas. These can be used with many different GenAI platforms. As an idea/challenge, I want to come up with a way for students to generate ideas for projects based on knowing who they would like to work with and that person's Google Scholar profile. Here is the catch: often, it can be difficult to access Google Scholar to do this. One solution  is to use Google Gemini, a Google product, to access another Google product. Going to apply this to my own profile - ego rides again . It went and did much when I click on it and deep research, it did a full research report. Prompt used :  " Using this as a starting point https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ghQedZAAAAAJ&hl=en from the research here provide 10 project ideas suitable for a final year Computer Science student project with this supervisor. For each provide title, 100 word summary, possible outcome s...

Analysis of Websites using Generative AI - compare poltical websites usability

Image created using DALL-E - love the bad spelling I want to explore using Generative AI to explore and compare websites. So I used using Google Gemini because of it its ability to work easily with websites.I choose UK three political party websites purely to compare like with like. Prompt 1: Analyse the following webpages website 1 https://www.conservatives.com/ , website 2 https://www.libdems.org.uk/  and website 3 https://labour.org.uk/ from a web user's perspective. For each website produce a report containing 2 tables. The first Table list issues with the site; for each issues provide at least three examples and then provide a list of potential solutions. Table 2 strengths of the site with each strength provide at least three examples. Add in any commentary Results It produced two tables per website and provided a summary comparing them at the end. Direct political statements were not produce. Now trying out personas and testing the website the politics side not filtered out ...