Table: Common Features in VR in Higher Education Research
Common Feature | Summary of Common Feature | Papers with Common Feature | Papers without Common Feature |
---|---|---|---|
Enhanced Learning Outcomes | Many studies highlight VR's potential to improve learning outcomes by providing immersive and interactive experiences that enhance student engagement and knowledge retention. | Pellas et al. (2023); Di Natale et al. (2023); Radianti et al. (2023); Lucarelli & Sullivan (2023); Cabrera-Duffaut et al. (2024); Affendy & Wanis (2023); Xie et al. (2024); Jensen & Konradsen (2023) | Hamilton et al. (2023); Scavarelli et al. (2023) |
Challenges in Implementation | High costs, technical requirements, and lack of specialized content are frequently noted as barriers to broader VR adoption in higher education. | Radianti et al. (2023); EDUCAUSE (2023); Scavarelli et al. (2023); Cabrera-Duffaut et al. (2024); Xie et al. (2024); Jensen & Konradsen (2023) | Pellas et al. (2023); Hamilton et al. (2023) |
Personalization and User Experience | A significant focus is on how VR can be tailored to individual learning needs, although it is often noted that more research is needed in this area. | Hamilton et al. (2023); Radianti et al. (2023); EDUCAUSE (2023); Affendy & Wanis (2023); Jensen & Konradsen (2023) | Pellas et al. (2023); Di Natale et al. (2023) |
Cross-disciplinary Applications | VR is applied across various disciplines, including health sciences, architecture, and social sciences, enhancing specific learning experiences unique to each field. | Lucarelli & Sullivan (2023); Scavarelli et al. (2023); EDUCAUSE (2023); Cabrera-Duffaut et al. (2024); Xie et al. (2024); Jensen & Konradsen (2023) | Pellas et al. (2023); Di Natale et al. (2023) |
Collaborative Learning | VR's ability to enhance collaborative learning through immersive and interactive virtual environments is emphasized in several studies. | Affendy & Wanis (2023); Scavarelli et al. (2023); Cabrera-Duffaut et al. (2024); Xie et al. (2024) | Hamilton et al. (2023); Pellas et al. (2023) |
Quantitative Learning Outcomes | Studies increasingly focus on the quantitative assessment of VR's effectiveness in learning outcomes compared to traditional or less immersive methods. | Xie et al. (2024); Jensen & Konradsen (2023); Cabrera-Duffaut et al. (2024); Affendy & Wanis (2023) | Pellas et al. (2023); Hamilton et al. (2023) |
References
Pellas, N., et al., 2023. How personalized and effective is immersive virtual reality in education? Multimedia Tools and Applications. Available at: link.springer.com.
Radianti, J., et al., 2023. Future Prospects and Considerations for AR and VR in Higher Education. EDUCAUSE Review. Available at: er.educause.edu.
Scavarelli, A., et al., 2023. Applications of VR in social learning environments: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Educational Technology.
Hamilton, D., et al., 2023. Immersive HMD-based VR educational applications. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia.
Lucarelli, R., & Sullivan, E., 2023. Reimagining Archaeology through VR: Exploring Ancient Egypt. Journal of Interactive Learning Research.
Di Natale, C., et al., 2023. The impact of immersive virtual reality on learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development.
Cabrera-Duffaut, A., et al., 2024. Immersive learning platforms: analyzing virtual reality's contribution to competence development in higher education. Frontiers in Education.
Affendy, M. N., & Wanis, A., 2023. Virtual reality and collaborative learning: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology.
Xie, X., et al., 2024. Use of VR in Higher Education: A Systematic Review (2014-2023). Journal of Educational Technology Research.
Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F., 2023. Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education.
The results from the analysis of the common features in research on VR in higher education indicate several key findings:
Enhanced Learning Outcomes: VR is consistently shown to improve learning outcomes by creating immersive, interactive environments that enhance student engagement and retention. This is supported by studies such as those by Pellas et al. (2023) and Jensen & Konradsen (2023).
Challenges in Implementation: High costs, technical requirements, and limited specialized content are significant barriers to VR's widespread adoption in higher education. Radianti et al. (2023) and Xie et al. (2024) highlight these issues.
Personalization and User Experience: While VR has potential for tailored educational experiences, more research is needed to fully exploit its capabilities. Studies like those by Hamilton et al. (2023) and Affendy & Wanis (2023) discuss this in detail.
Cross-disciplinary Applications: VR's use across various disciplines, from health sciences to social sciences, indicates its versatility in enhancing specific educational experiences (Lucarelli & Sullivan, 2023; Xie et al., 2024).
Collaborative Learning: VR is particularly effective in promoting collaborative learning, with multiple studies emphasizing its benefits in creating immersive, shared learning environments (Affendy & Wanis, 2023; Scavarelli et al., 2023).
Quantitative Learning Outcomes: Recent studies focus more on quantitatively assessing VR's effectiveness, comparing it with traditional methods to validate its impact on learning outcomes (Jensen & Konradsen, 2023; Xie et al., 2024).
Overall, while VR shows great promise in enhancing learning outcomes and enabling collaborative, cross-disciplinary education, challenges related to cost, technical requirements, and personalization must be addressed for broader adoption.
Comments
Post a Comment